New Location, Same Tradition: Goldstein & Orr Has Moved Offices Learn More

Client Testimonials
  • "I have known Ms. Orr for over a decade and she is an excellent criminal defense attorney with high ethical standards." by Peer Attorney Read More
  • "The best of the best above all the rest. Accept no substitutes." by Richard R. Read More
  • "They are next level on intelligence and understanding. My full respect to these attorneys." by Amber R. Read More
  • "I was so fortunate and privileged to have Mr. Goldstein in my corner. You will find none better." by Stephen Read More
  • "GGH has no equal in Texas or elsewhere. Cynthia Orr and Gerry Goldstein don't just defend their clients, they make law. I've watched them over the years take impossible cases and win." by Debra I. Read More


Answers such as “I don’t know” or “I don’t recall” constitute answers and are, therefore, not contemptuous,


In re Michael, 326 U.S. 224 (1945);

Ex Parte Hudgins, 249 U.S. 379 (1914);

Brown v. U.S., 356 U.S. 148, 185 (1958) (providing a perjurious answer is not contempt where they can be shown to be false they may form the basis for a perjury prosecution);


Gebhard v. U.S., 422 U.S. 281 (9th Cir. 1970);

U.S. v. Nicolletti, 310 F.2d 359 (7th Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 372 U.S. 942 (1963);

U.S. v. Sweig, 441 F.2d 114 (2d Cir. 1971).

In re Investigating Grand Jury of Chester County, Pennsylvania (Lees), No. 197 Misc. 1987 (Pa. S.Ct. July 27, 1988) (responding that one does not remember constitutes testimony-the remedy, if the judge supervising the grand jury is  convinced that the answer is not a truthful one, is an indictment for perjury, not contempt), or obstruction of justice [18 U.S.C. §§ 1503 & 1505].


See  U.S. v. Alo, 439 F.2d 751 (2d Cir. 1971);

U.S. v. Cohn, 452 F.2d 881 (2d Cir. 1971).


See also        In re Grand Jury Proceedings, 539 F.2d 382 (5th Cir. 1976) (stating that there is no right to competency hearing where witness claims inability to recall).

(210) 226-1463
  1. Attorneys
  2. Results
  3. Contact