New Location, Same Tradition: Goldstein & Orr Has Moved Offices Learn More

Client Testimonials
  • "I have known Ms. Orr for over a decade and she is an excellent criminal defense attorney with high ethical standards." by Peer Attorney Read More
  • "I'm very impressed how Mrs. Orr handled everything, she is very professional and I recommend Mrs. Orr if your in need an attorney for a white collar case!!!" by Anonymous Former Client Read More
  • "The best of the best above all the rest. Accept no substitutes." by Richard R. Read More
  • "They are next level on intelligence and understanding. My full respect to these attorneys." by Amber R. Read More
  • "GGH has no equal in Texas or elsewhere. Cynthia Orr and Gerry Goldstein don't just defend their clients, they make law. I've watched them over the years take impossible cases and win." by Debra I. Read More


The knowing presentation of perjured testimony in order to secure a conviction violates due process. Miller v. Pate, 386 U.S. 1 (1967) [deliberate misrepresentation at trial]; Napue v. Illinois, 360 U.S. 264 (1959) [witness testified falsely he did not have a deal which the prosecutor did not correct]; U.S. v. Anderson, 574 F.2d 1347 (5th Cir. 1978) [false testimony cannot be used to support a conviction]; U.S. v. Martinez- Mercado, 888 F.2d 1484 (5th Cir. 1989) [presentation of evidence which the prosecution knows is false sets out a due process violation].


Several Circuits have reversed the defendant’s convictions based upon presentation of perjured testimony before the grand jury where the prosecutor was aware of the perjured testimony. Dismissal is necessary to protect the integrity of the judicial process. See

U.S. v. Basurto, 497 F.2d 781 (9th Cir. 1974); U.S. v. Giorgi, 840 F.2d 1022 (1st Cir. 1988); U.S. v. Page, 808 F.2d 723 (10th Cir. 1987); U.S. v. Thibideau, 671 F.2d 75 (2nd

Cir. 1982). The Fifth Circuit has also stated that it will dismiss an indictment with prejudice if the government conduct rises to the level of deliberate misconduct or even gross negligence. See U.S. v. Fulmer, 722 F.2d 1192 (5th Cir. 1983); U.S. v. Campagnulo, 592 F.2d 852 (5th Cir. 1979). If the indictment was obtained by the presentation of testimony the prosecutor knew to be perjured, the court should reverse the conviction. See U.S. v. Baskes, 433 F.Supp. 799, 804-807 (N.D. Ill. 197)[ cited with approval in U.S. v. Campagnuolo, 592 F.2d 852, 865 (5th Cir. 1979)


Recently, several courts have raised questions regarding the use and/or abuse of the federal grand jury process by Independent Counsel In the investigation of whether President Clinton committed perjury in a civil deposition concerning his sexual relationship with Monica Lewinsky the Office of Independent Counsel apparently leaked secret information about the investigation to the press. In re: Sealed Case No: 99-3091, 192 F.3d 995 (D.C. Cir. 1999).

(210) 226-1463
  1. Attorneys
  2. Results
  3. Contact