New Location, Same Tradition: Goldstein & Orr Has Moved Offices Learn More

Client Testimonials
  • "I have known Ms. Orr for over a decade and she is an excellent criminal defense attorney with high ethical standards." by Peer Attorney Read More
  • "I'm very impressed how Mrs. Orr handled everything, she is very professional and I recommend Mrs. Orr if your in need an attorney for a white collar case!!!" by Anonymous Former Client Read More
  • "They are next level on intelligence and understanding. My full respect to these attorneys." by Amber R. Read More
  • "They're the best, very thorough." by Doug T. Read More
  • "GGH has no equal in Texas or elsewhere. Cynthia Orr and Gerry Goldstein don't just defend their clients, they make law. I've watched them over the years take impossible cases and win." by Debra I. Read More

Grandy Jury Practice: Table of Contents

Read Full Document

  • Part I: Grand Jury Practice(Read Full Document)

    • GRAND JURY PRACTICE ……………….1
    • THE GRAND JURY’S COMPOSITION ……………..2
    • MOTION TO QUASH GRAND JURY …………2
    • ESTABLISHING A PRIMA FACIE SHOWING OF DISCRIMINATION……………………………4
      • BURDEN THEN SHIFTS TO THE GOVERNMENT …….. 5
      • IDENTIFIABLE GROUPS…………….. 6
        • African Americans:…… 6
        • Women:…….. 6
        • Young adults: ………… 6
        • Others:……….. 7
      • SELECTION OF GRAND JURY FOREPERSON MAY ALSO CONSTITUTE SUCH A DEPRIVATION:…………….. 7
      • STANDING TO COMPLAIN OF SYSTEMATIC EXCLUSION ………… 8
      • An evidentiary hearing must be provided:…………. 9
      • TIMELINESS OF THE CHALLENGE………………. 9
    • PARTICULAR GRAND JUROR NEED NOT BE PRESENT AT EVERY SESSION TO VOTE DEFENDANT TRUE BILL……11
    • PRESENCE OF UNAUTHORIZED PERSONS……………..11
    • REQUIREMENT TO PRESENT EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE………..12
    • ABUSE OF GRAND JURY……………….12
    • SECRECY…………………13
      • FEDERAL: ……………13
        • GOVERNMENT USE OF GRAND JURY MATERIALS TO DETERMINE WHETHER TO PROCEED IN A CIVIL ACTION …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………14
        • GOVERNMENT’S USE OF GRAND JURY INFORMATION TO PURSUE CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION
        • ELSEWHERE……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………15
    • NO INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL FOR A VIOLATION OF THE RULE OF SECRECY …….16
      • FEDERAL: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………16
      • STATE: ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..16
    • FIRST AMENDMENT ISSUES AND THE RIGHT OF A GRAND JURY WITNESSES TO THEIR OWN TESTIMONY………………………………………………………………………………………..17
    • RIGHT TO COPY OF TRANSCRIPT…………………………………………………………………………..18
    • RIGHT TO HAVE WITNESS’ GRAND JURY TESTIMONY TRANSCRIBED …………………18
      • FEDERAL: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………19
      • STATE: ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..19
    • PROBLEMS REGARDING GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS……………………………………………..19
      • PLACE TO APPEAR………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………19
      • SPECIFICITY IN SUBPOENA IS NOT REQUIRED…………………………………………………………………………….21
      • SERVICE OF GRAND JURY SUBPOENA…………………………………………………………………………………………21
      • WHO MAY BE SUBPOENAED?………………………………………………………………………………………………………21
        • “Targets” of Investigations……………………………………………………………………………………………………………22
        • Lawyers…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….22
      • WHERE GOVERNMENT REFUSES TO FOLLOW INTERNAL GUIDELINES………………………………….22
      • SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM: ITEMS SOUGHT MUST BE ADEQUATELY DESCRIBED………………………23
      • “OPPRESSIVENESS”, NOT “RELEVANCY”, IS THE TEST ………………………………………………………………..24
      • RULE 17 APPLICABLE IN PART TO GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS……………………………………………………..25
    • POST INDICTMENT GRAND JURY INVESTIGATION……………………………………………….25
      • THE GENERAL RULE: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….25
        • IMPERMISSIBLE TO EMPLOY THE NON-RECIPROCAL BENEFITS OF A GRAND JURY INVESTIGATION FOR DISCOVERY AGAINST AN INDICTED DEFENDANT…………………………………….27
        • STANDARD APPLIED …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..28
        • INCIDENTAL USE OF INFORMATION OBTAINED THROUGH GRAND JURY IN PENDING TRIALS…..29
        • BY HOOK OR BY CROOK ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..30
    • THE FIFTH AMENDMENT AS APPLICABLE TO GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS ………..30
      • ANSWER NEED ONLY BE “ADVERSE” ………………………………………………………………………………………….31
      • REQUIRING A WITNESS TO INVOKE PRIVILEGE BEFORE GRAND JURY……………………………………….32
      • IT IS THE COMPELLED PRODUCTION WHICH IS PROTECTED BY THE PRIVILEGE………………………..34
      • FIFTH AMENDMENT PRIVILEGE PROTECTS AGAINST COMPELLED PRODUCTION OF RECORDS OF SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….35
      • SIZE OR DIVERSITY OF SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP NOT RELEVANT ………………………………………….36
      • CUSTODIAN OF “CORPORATE RECORDS” HAS NO “ACT OF PRODUCTION” FIFTH AMENDMENT PRIVILEGE…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..37
      • REQUIRED RECORDS………………………………………………………………………………………………………………39
      • MUST HAVE “JURISDICTION” OVER CORPORATION……………………………………………………………………39
      • SOLE PROPRIETOR MAY RETAIN RIGHT TO INTERVENE AND PRECLUDE COMPELLED PRODUCTION OF RECORDS FROM EMPLOYEE…………………………………………………………………………….40
    • GRAND JURY WITNESS: …………………………………………………………………………………………41
      • MATERIAL WITNESSES……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….41
    • SANCTION AND APPEAL FOR CONTEMPT……………………………………………………………..43
      • REFUSAL TO COMPLY…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………43
      • CONTEMPT POWERLIMITED……………………………………………………………………………………………………….43
      • ENTITLED TO “ONE BITE” THEORY ……………………………………………………………………………………………..44
      • MOTION TO INTERVENE ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..44
      • INTERVENOR HAS RIGHT TO INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL…………………………………………………………….47
      • “CONTENT” VS. “ACT OF PRODUCTION” ANALYSIS TO SUBPOENAS DUCES TECUM …………………..48
    • EFFECT OF GUILTY PLEA ON ABILITY TO INVOKE FIFTH AMENDMENT PRIVILEGE ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….50
    • IMMUNIZING GRAND JURY WITNESSES………………………………………………………………..51
      • FEDERAL: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………51
      • TEXAS:………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..52
      • USE IMMUNITY STATUTE [28 U.S.C. § 6002] PROHIBITS USING COMPELLED TESTIMONY IN “ANY RESPECT”…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….52
      • CERTIFICATION OF EVIDENCE OBTAINED INDEPENDENTLY OF GRAND JURY TESTIMONY ………53
      • GRAND JURY HEARING COMPELLED TESTIMONY SHOULD NOT THEREAFTER INDICT THE WITNESS……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..54
      • HEARING REQUIRED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF ORDER GRANTING IMMUNITY? …………………………..55
      • JUSTICE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL MUST EXPRESSLY APPROVE GRANT OF IMMUNITY ………………56
      • DISTRICT COURT HAS DISCRETION TO DENY AN ORDER WHERE SAME WOULD INFRINGE UPON CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS………………………………………………………………………………………………………….57
      • FEAR OF FOREIGN PROSECUTION……………………………………………………………………………………………….58
      • IMMUNITY STATEMENT EXPRESSLY EXEMPTS “FALSE STATEMENTS” PROSECUTION………………58
      • PRIOR STATEMENTS TO FEDERAL OFFICER………………………………………………………………………………..59
      • PRIOR INCONSISTENT STATEMENTS COULD BE USED TO PROVE INCONSISTENT TESTIMONY BEFORE GRAND JURY WAS PERJUROUS: ……………………………………………………………………………………60
      • THE IMMUNIZED WITNESS………………………………………………………………………………………………………….60
      • SEALING OF PROSECUTION’S EVIDENCE PRIOR TO TAKING IMMUNIZED TESTIMONY……………….61
      • NOT SEEK INDICTMENT FROM SAME GRAND JURY HEARING THAT COMPELLED TESTIMONY….61
      • RIGHT TO COUNSEL…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….61
      • NO ADVERSE INFERENCE FROM EXERCISE OF RIGHT TO COUNSEL……………………………………………61
      • CONSEQUENCES TO WITNESS OF COMPELLED TESTIMONY……………………………………………………….61
      • ‘GRAND JURY’S RIGHT NOT TO COMPEL TESTIMONY ………………………………………………………………….61
    • OTHER TESTIMONIAL PRIVILEGES APPLICABLE TO GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS…..62
          • ATTORNEY-CLIENT…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….63
          • WHERE THE VERY EXISTENCE OF THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP MIGHT BE INCRIMINATING TO A CLIENT, SAME MAY UNDER LIMITED CIRCUMSTANCES BE PRIVILEGED
            ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..63
            COURTS AND COMMENTATORS OFTEN SEPARATE THE EXCEPTIONS INTO ONE OF THREE
            CATEGORIES:………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….66

            • 1. THE “LAST LINK EXCEPTION”: ………………………………………………………………………………………………….66
            • 2. THE “LEGAL ADVICE” EXCEPTION:…………………………………………………………………………………………..66
            • 3. THE CONFIDENTIAL COMMUNICATION EXCEPTION: ……………………67
        • CLIENT WITH PENDING CASE …………………………………………………………………………………………………67
        • TIMING IS EVERYTHING …………………………………………………………………………………………………………68
        • DISCUSSIONS BETWEEN AN INDIVIDUAL AND “A LAWYER REPRESENTING ANOTHER IN A MATTER OF COMMON INTEREST” ARE PRIVILEGED……………………………………………………………..69
        • JOINT DEFENSE/REPRESENTATION…………………………………………………………………………………………69
        • PRIVILEGE PROTECTS COMMUNICATIONS AT MEETING BETWEEN “PERSONS SUBJECT TO POSSIBLE INDICTMENT” AND THEIR LAWYER……………………………………………………………………….70
        • CRIME-FRAUD EXCEPTION……………………………………………………………………………………………………..71
        • IN CAMERA EXAMINATION…………………………………………………………………………………………………….73
        • MAY “PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION” ITSELF BE CONSIDERED IN……………………………………….73
        • PRELIMINARY REQUIREMENT OF RELEVANCY……………………………………………………………………..73
        • PRELIMINARY REQUIREMENT OF NEED…………………………………………………………………………………74
        • ATTORNEY SELF-DEFENSE EXCEPTION………………………………………………………………………………….75
        • GRANT OF IMMUNITY TO CLIENT DOES NOT DESTROY ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE ………75
        • STATE CHALLENGE OF ATTORNEY’S GRAND JURY SUBPOENA……………………………………………..75
        • CODE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY……………………………………………………………………………77
      • DISTINCT PRIVILEGE UNDER “WORK-PRODUCT DOCTRINE” …………………………………………………….77
        • DOCTRINE PROTECTS ADVERSARY PROCESS ITSELF…………………………………………………………..78
        • WORK-PRODUCT DOCTRINE BROADER THAN ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE……………………..78
        • DOCTRINE PROTECTS ATTORNEY NOT CLIENT …………………………………………………………………….79
        • DOCTRINE APPLICABLE TO CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS…………………………………………………………..79
        • DOCTRINE APPLIES TO TESTIMONY RESPECTING A WITNESS’ ORAL STATEMENTS TO AN
        • ATTORNEY PREPARING HIS CASE FOR TRIAL ………………………………………………………………………..79
        • CRIME-FRAUD EXCEPTION……………………………………………………………………………………………………..80
        • CLIENT’S LOCATION MAY BE A PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION…………………………………………..80
      • FIFTH AMENDMENT PRIVILEGE AGAINST COMPELLED PRODUCTION OF “PRIVATE PAPERS” …..81
      • FOREIGN LAW …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….82
      • MARITAL PRIVILEGES…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………82
        • [ADVERSE SPOUSAL TESTIMONY VS. MARITAL COMMUNICATIONS]……………………………………82
        • ADVERSE TESTIMONIAL PRIVILEGE VESTS IN TESTIFYING SPOUSE……………………………………..83
        • COVERS ACTS AND COMMUNICATIONS…………………………………………………………………………………83
        • NEED NOT BE CONFIDENTIAL ………………………………………………………………………………………………..83
        • NO PRIVILEGE IF MARRIAGE DEFUNCT………………………………………………………………………………….84
        • CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE EXCEPTION APPLIES ONLY TO “CONFIDENTIAL COMMUNICATIONS
        • PRIVILEGE” NOT “ADVERSE TESTIMONIAL PRIVILEGE” ………………………………………………………..84
        • TESTIMONY NEED NOT BE TECHNICALLY INCRIMINATING TO BE “ADVERSE” …………………….84
        • CRUEL TRILEMMA………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….85
      • ESTABLISHING PRIVILEGE BY IN CAMERA PROFFER………………………………………………………………….85
      • FAMILY PRIVILEGE …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….86
      • PSYCHOTHERAPIST-PATIENT PRIVILEGE……………………………………………………………………………………87
    • RIGHT TO COUNSEL……………………………………………………………………………………………….87
    • DEFENDANT’S GRAND JURY TESTIMONY……………………………………………………………..89
    • GRAND JURY TRANSCRIPTS OF OTHER WITNESSES……………………………………………..90
    • REQUESTS FOR DOCUMENTS OBTAINED BY GRAND JURY ………………………………….91
    • POOR MEMORY………………………………………………………………………………………………………91
    • ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE ……………………………………………………………………………….92
    • WHAT MATTERS MAY GRAND JURY INVESTIGATE?…………………………………………….92
    • INEFFECTIVE” BY DEFINITION……………………………………………………………………………..93
    • ADVICE OF “RIGHTS” OF GRAND JURY WITNESSES ……………………………………………..93
    • GRAND JURY REFORMS …………………………………………………………………………………………94
(210) 226-1463
  1. Attorneys
  2. Results
  3. Contact