Goldstein & Orr Celebrates Better Business Bureau Anniversary! Learn More

Client Testimonials
  • "John's ability to navigate complex legal matters with precision, while still offering empathy and reassurance, was nothing short of remarkable." by Former Client Read More
  • "I have known Ms. Orr for over a decade and she is an excellent criminal defense attorney with high ethical standards." by Peer Attorney Read More
  • "The best of the best above all the rest. Accept no substitutes." by Richard R. Read More
  • "They are next level on intelligence and understanding. My full respect to these attorneys." by Amber R. Read More
  • "They're the best, very thorough." by Doug T. Read More

COMMERCIAL PROPERTY

While “the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures is applicable to commercial premises, as well as to private homes…”, it has been recognized that “[A]n expectation of privacy in commercial premises, however, is different from, and indeed less than, a similar expectation in an individual’s home”. New York v. Burger,107 S.Ct. 2636, 96 L.Ed.2d 601 (1987).

Moreover, in contrast to the private home-owners Fourth Amendment rights, the owner of commercial property has no expectation of privacy beyond the interior of its covered buildings (there apparently is no “curtilage” recognized with respect to commercial property).

“The intimate activities associated with family privacy and the home and its curtilage simply do not reach the outdoor areas or spaces between structures and buildings of a manufacturing plant.” Dow Chemical Co. v. U.S., 476 U.S. at 236 [upholding EPA’s aerial surveillance].

(210) 226-1463
  1. Attorneys
  2. Results
  3. Contact