New Location, Same Tradition: Goldstein & Orr Has Moved Offices Learn More

Client Testimonials
  • "I have known Ms. Orr for over a decade and she is an excellent criminal defense attorney with high ethical standards." by Peer Attorney Read More
  • "The best of the best above all the rest. Accept no substitutes." by Richard R. Read More
  • "They're the best, very thorough." by Doug T. Read More
  • "I was so fortunate and privileged to have Mr. Goldstein in my corner. You will find none better." by Stephen Read More
  • "GGH has no equal in Texas or elsewhere. Cynthia Orr and Gerry Goldstein don't just defend their clients, they make law. I've watched them over the years take impossible cases and win." by Debra I. Read More


Texas Code of Criminal Procedure 38.05 states that In ruling upon the admissibility of evidence, the judge shall not discuss or comment upon the weight of the same or its bearing in the case, but shall simply decide whether or not it is admissible; nor shall he, at any stage of the proceeding previous to the return of the verdict, make any remark calculated to convey to the jury his opinion of the case.@ Tex. C. Crim. Pro. 38.05. But, in order to be grounds for reversal, the court=s remark must be material to the case. Simon v. State, 2006 WL 2771796 (Tex. App.BHous. (14 Dist.)). A defendant=s right is harmed when the judge=s comment Ahad a substantial and injurious effect or influence in determining the jury=s verdict.@ Id. To determine whether the error was harmful, the Court of Appeals in Simon decided that the court must consider everything in the record, and Aask if a reasonable probability exists that the error moved the jury from a state of non-persuasion to one of persuasion beyond a reasonable doubt.@ Id. In Simon, a DWI case, the Court of Appeals found that the even though the trial court did not intend any adverse consequences, his comments could in fact be found to influence the jury toward the State=s

position regarding the Intoxilyzer used to test Simon=s breath. Id. The trial courts comments, taken as a whole, demanded reversal and warranted a new trial.  Id.

(210) 226-1463
  1. Attorneys
  2. Results
  3. Contact